Last refreshed

Overall score

Weighting
• Freshness: 35%
• Metadata: 35%
• Accessibility: 15%
• Completeness: 10%
• Usability: 5%
Weights scale when dimensions are missing

Grade

• <60% is "Bronze"
• >=60% is "Silver"
• >=80% is "Gold"

Freshness 100%

• Is the dataset not being refreshed on schedule (if it has a refresh rate)?
• Has the data not been updated in over 2 years?

Is the dataset up-to-date?

No known issues

Metadata 50%

• Are there metadata missing from the dataset?
• Is the dataset associated with a placeholder email, like opendata@toronto.ca?
• Is the 'Learn More' URL a broken link?
• Are data definitions missing?

Is the data well described?

Known issues:

• The following metadata field(s) are empty:
• information_url


• The following column definitions are empty:
• LINEAR_NAME_ID
• WARD_2021
• RECEIVED_DATE
• LO_NUM_SUF
• HI_NUM_SUF
• ATTRACTION
• LO_NUM
• MUNICIPALITY
• MI_PRINX
• GEOID
• WARD_2003
• ADDRESS_POINT_ID
• LINEAR_NAME_FULL
• HI_NUM
• POSTAL_CODE
• MAP_ACCESS
• ADDRESS_NUMBER
• WARD
• CITY
• PLACE_NAME
• GENERAL_USE_CODE
• CENTRELINE

Accessibility 100%

• Are there any tags/keywords on the dataset?
• Is this dataset updated manually by the Open Data team?
• Is the data stored as a file instead of a database table?

Is the data easy to access for different kinds of users?

No known issues

Completeness 100%

• Are more than half of the values in this dataset null?

Is there lots of missing data?

No known issues

Usability 91%

• Do columns have meaningful, English names?
• Do any columns have a single, constant value?

How easy is it to work with the data?

Known issues:

• The following column(s) contain constant values:
• HI_NUM
• RECEIVED_DATE
• EMAIL
• LO_NUM_SUF
• HI_NUM_SUF